Jea Moon Lee vs Seongbin Sim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 06:41 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Moon Lee vs S. Sim

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lee 1 - 0 Sim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jea Moon Lee winning 2 and Seongbin Sim winning 0. The last match between Jea Moon Lee and Seongbin Sim was at the M25 Changwon, 04-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jea Moon Lee getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lee | 1 |
| Sim | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Changwon(06-04-25)
J. M. Lee vs S. Sim H2H Profile
J. M. Lee vs S. Sim Match Preview:
- Second serve advantage: Recently, Sim has won 46.25% of second serve points, while Lee has managed 43.66%. Why is this important? A higher percentage can lead to more reliable service games.
- Return game effectiveness: Sim's recent form shows they win 49.71% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Lee's 48.91%. Interestingly, Lee is slightly better at returning first serves, with 30.29% versus Sim's 25.22%.
- Handling pressure: Sim saves 56.52% of break points under pressure, slightly outperforming Lee, who saves 54.5%. Which player might keep their cool better? The stats suggest a slight edge for Sim.
- Recent match success: Over the last year, Sim has a 60.66% win rate, whereas Lee's is 72.22%. Does Lee have a winning edge here? It appears so.
- Preferred surface performance: Both players have their best win percentages on indoor hard courts, with Lee winning 71% and Sim at 67%.
- Competition level comparison: Sim typically competes against higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 185.74, while Lee's opponents rank around 388.08. Might this indicate Sim is more used to challenging matches?
- Deciding sets: If the match goes long, Lee has a better deciding set win rate at 58% compared to Sim's 35%.
- Breakpoint conversion: Both players are closely matched here, with Sim converting 32.14% of opportunities and Lee at 32.75%. Could this suggest neither player has a significant edge on crucial points?
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
When comparing the two players, Sim demonstrates an edge in second serve reliability and maintaining composure under pressure, which could prove beneficial in tight situations.
However, Lee's overall match-winning record over the past year, combined with greater success in deciding sets, suggests a resiliency that may tip the scales in their favor.
Although Sim faces tougher opponents on average, Lee's capacity to prevail more frequently against less challenging opposition may enhance their confidence and momentum.
In conclusion, while Sim and Lee both showcase specific strengths, Lee’s performance trends indicate a slightly higher probability of success in the upcoming match.
Jea Moon Lee vs Seongbin Sim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. M. Lee vs S. Sim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:3:54 | Average Match Time | 1:3:54 |
| 52% (15/29) | 1st Serve % | 41% (24/59) |
| 87% (13/15) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 79% (11/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (36/59) | Return Points Win % | 17% (5/29) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. M. Lee Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 1-6 6-3 2-2 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(6) 6-3 4-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
S. Sim Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | ||

J. M. Lee vs S. Sim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.46% (212/107) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.58% (95/70) |
| 64.07% (453/254) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.37% (214/159) |
| 56.16% (3585/2799) | Games Win/Loss | 52.36% (1864/1696) |
| 66.79% (187/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.08% (65/53) |
| 69.57% (16/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (20/8) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 509 | Aces Total | 324 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 256 | Total Double Faults | 267 |
| 1:2:4 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 416.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 248.42 |
| 66% (8063/12159) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3137/5232) |
| 67% (5435/8063) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2090/3137) |
| 51% (2089/4096) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1025/2095) |
| 43% (634/1474) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (224/530) |
| 43% (5516/12906) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2069/5161) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28.00% (7/18) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 70.21% (205/87) | Futures W/L | 57.76% (93/68) |
| 67% (209/311) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (94/162) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (38/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (23/37) |
| 59% (44/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 93% (207/192) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (96/86) |
| 7% (207/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (96/10) |
| 18% (112/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (69/9) |